Subject:
|
Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 03:23:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
127 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Culberson <t_c_c@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3A7F69BB.27714E72@yahoo.com...
> Slowing Earth Rotation:
> Moon drift:
> Oldest tree:
Check out
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_argu
ments/
All these arguments and many more creationist arguments are refuted (with
references).
> Anyone want to continue this endless debate :)?
Guess so 8?)
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| (...) Thank you Ross. This citation is the most direct refutation you could have found :)...and since I don't have any counter-refutations myself, I'm not going to argue it :) Please note that this does not, however, mean that I believe it or admit (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| ....that I wouldn't re-enter the creation/evolution debate but I've changed my mind. Oh well. (For reference sake and to clarify some definitions): I believe that God created everything about 6000 years ago (possibly as much as 10) and that about (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
