Subject:
|
Re: Lucky Americans
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:09:55 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@ANTISPAMnovera.com
|
Viewed:
|
1756 times
|
| |
|
|
Pat wrote:
> Larry,
> Anyone making $60 an hour is indeed a lucky person. Considering that minimum
> wage is only around $5.25 and most people consider a $10 an hour job doing
> well. No hard feelings intended here....but some of us have to work 3 hours
> for that same CD player, and it isn't behind a desk either.
> No hard feelings, just think about the blue collar guys huh?
> Pat
Your point is well taken, although I'd go farther and say that 10 an
hour isn't considered by everyone as 'doing well', if that's the wage
that a single wage earner is making. It is HARD to get by on 400 a week
pretax (that's about 20K a year).
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lucky Americans
|
| No, it's bloody IMPOSSIBLE to get by on $400/week POST-tax in my area, unless you have multiple earners in a household. With rents at $1200+ for any area short of slums around here, $400/wk barely pays the rent. Don't get me started on that :-/ (...) (27 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lucky Americans
|
| (...) Larry, Anyone making $60 an hour is indeed a lucky person. Considering that minimum wage is only around $5.25 and most people consider a $10 an hour job doing well. No hard feelings intended here....but some of us have to work 3 hours for that (...) (27 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
