| |
[F-UP to .debate, not that this is much of a debate, but it is o-t, and not
shopping, and .debate was already on the list.]
In lugnet.market.shopping, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Thanks for that ref. notice how it claims the American Horse is a second
> cast. Incorrect. It is as if you took two sets and mingled the pieces,
> then reassembled them. Not possible to say which set was first and what
> set was second any longer.
Got a reference for that? I've wondered, but I've never seen any solid
documentation of the 1st/2nd cast vs. mixed-casting.
> (each horse consists of a number of individual cast pieces which is
> assembled into the entire horse)
I believe there were 7 pieces to each casting.
> Calling it the "second horse" is slighting Fred.
>
> And that's the organization's site! The media has it much less correct.
Do you expect the organization to be more truthful than the media they are
spoon-feeding? More accurate on the stuff they want to tell, but they are still
going to hide their, umm, 'skeletons'.
Like being financed by a grocer from Michigan.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Meijers in Grand Rapids
|
| (...) I believe I saw it in the GR Press but I can't be sure of the reference chain beyond that. Hey, it fit my preconceived notions about the national press so I bought it. :-) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Meijers in Grand Rapids
|
| Thanks for that ref. notice how it claims the American Horse is a second cast. Incorrect. It is as if you took two sets and mingled the pieces, then reassembled them. Not possible to say which set was first and what set was second any longer. (each (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
