Subject:
|
Re: How to start a fire.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:47:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1748 times
|
| |
|
|
> He's not much of a debater then, is he? If you're really interested in
> tackling this subject, I'm game.
> The first point of contention is that a blastocyst is not a person, and the
> elimination of a blastocyst is not the elimination of a person, innocent or
> otherwise.
Agreed.
> The second point of contention is that a sentient person is not the same as
> a non-sentient person. That is, a pre-brain-functional human is not
> equivalent to a brain-functional person. This is true even if the
> pre-brain-functional person currently holds the office of President of the US.
Disagree. Once the cell mass is discernably human and has a heartbeat it is a
person. What about the mentally handicapped?
> The third point of contention is that an innocent person with years of
> experiences and memories is not the same as an innocent pre-person with zero
> experiences or memories.
So the age of a person determines their worth?
> The fourth point of contention is that a fetus that does not have
> independent physiological viability is not the same as a person who has
> independent physiological viability.
What about the physically handicapped?
>
> How's that for starters?
I belive freedom of choice is whether or not to have sex. If peopole do
*anything* it is their responsibility to deal with the concequences. Murder to
avoid inconvience is just sick.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: How to start a fire.
|
| (...) Who determines when it's discernably human? If I put a 64-cell embryo on your desk, would you be able to tell me that it's human? Who do you identify as a credible authority on determining humanness? By pre-brain-functional, I refer to brains (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: How to start a fire.
|
| (...) He's not much of a debater then, is he? If you're really interested in tackling this subject, I'm game. The first point of contention is that a blastocyst is not a person, and the elimination of a blastocyst is not the elimination of a person, (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
