Debate : 15671


Off-Topic / Debate / 15671	15670 \| 15672

Subject:	Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:15:23 GMT
Viewed:	50 times

In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Richard Marchetti writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Kevin Wilson writes: > > They are? I thought we made it up :-) > > Nope. I have used the term before. As have others... Sorry Hoppy...some 10 instances found on the web (I went a bit further than Google) do not put the word into the vernacular. Citing the Windows example, now there is a word DEFINATELY in the vernacular before trademark was claimed upon it...and Microsoft is STILL winning cases on its usage... Matt (NOW this could belong in market.theory, but I guess I'll shunt it to .debate for the possible argument...)

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
(...) I there is a difference between what passes for stare decisis and what is ACTUALLY right... -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
(...) Nope. I have used the term before. As have others... (URL) Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

61 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search