Subject:
|
constructive posts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:47:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
803 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.market.theory, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > Surly another case of: "do as I say, not as I do"! ;)
>
> Was this a constructive post Scott? I remember you once asserting that your
> posts outside of l.o-t.d were always constructive.
I doubt I said "always"? I would also suggest you read the context to my
comment, where KW was able to show a little humility in his response:
http://news.lugnet.com/market/theory/?n=2252
If we agree that hypocrites chastising people for writing “Lego” rather than
“LEGO(r)” would encourage a non-constructive environment here, then perhaps
my post was constructive? If I wanted to be non-constructive I would have
just called LP a "hypocrite" or let him cause another mess... I done
niether. If you read the entire thread you will see that my view, at least
in part, is shared by others.
You will also note that to end the "debate" I set FUT L.O-T.F. You have
replied to L.O-T.D - was that "constructive" or trouble making? (an honest
question)
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: constructive posts
|
| (...) Written in .debate: "when I post outside this group I try to be 100% constructive. I have to be..." You didn't use the word always, you used 100%. And, to be fair, you said you try. So are you asserting that this was constructive or that you (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
