To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14195
14194  |  14196
Subject: 
What, no answer? (was Re: On the veracity of statistics in general)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:44:29 GMT
Viewed: 
318 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
If you think the UN stats lack rigour. Show us.

I did. Go to the top of the thread and *read* the article I cited.

I have not read it yet. You said you found it yesterday. What was your basis
before then? When you said (04.10.01):

"I have no faith in statistics that are originated by the UN unless
independently corroborated, and that's a blanket statement."

What, no answer?

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: On the veracity of statistics in general
 
(...) I have not read it yet. You said you found it yesterday. What was your basis before then? When you said (04.10.01): "I have no faith in statistics that are originated by the UN unless independently corroborated, and that's a blanket (...) (23 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

26 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR