 | | Re: Evil Spammers
|
|
I've been using AOL since '94, and I only recently started getting spam, and it is no more than once a week. Of course, all I use it for now is e-mail. ;) Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
<cross-posted to .off-topic.debate, follow-up set there, too> (...) The dictionary isn't alway the safest bet - given that dictionaries will often include slang words and phrases. (...) Homophobic is a slang term, which derives from another slang (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
<cross-posted to off-topic.debate> (...) Yup, they do. (...) encouraging (...) Laws don't affect our right to say things. Laws enforce the consequences of our having said them. (...) By using the term 'ill', you are implying that there is something (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Evil Spammers
|
|
Aha! An argument I can carry. Unfortunately, it's hard for me to find anyone who would rationally argue the other side. :-P (...) There is absolutely no reason for AOL to be against spamming, for several reasons: 1: The income they get from selling (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Evil Spammers
|
|
The evil spammers have found ICQ. I have received two spam messages over the last two days, offering cheap phone service and something else less savoury. Don't respond, and add the individuals to your ignore list straight away, so that you receive (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) Ack. I went to the bookstore I _thought_ I saw it at. No luck. I might be getting senile....... But not giving up yet. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) You overrate plumbing, my friend. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
Well, you have to admit, that it sounds good to begin with ... I know OF it, though I'm not IN it ... After listening more and more to politicians and others, I'm starting to think more and more Libertarian and Constitutionalist ... Anyway ... -Lee. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) I really don't think so. I read all the books, and I distinctly remember seeing the book, glancing quickly at it, and saying to myself "bout time" and to try to remember to check the library to see if it is in or on order. I am going that way (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) It's not at barnesandnoble.com - sure you didn't see one of the earlier books in the series? Jasper (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) Apparently. If one goews by the mathematical formula, the gaps seem to increase quadratically, and the next book should be out in ~6 years... Jasper (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) Naturally. I mean, well, _duh_. Of course chocolate is among the prime necessities, right along with plumbing. Jasper (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
Jeff Stembel wrote in message ... (...) Libertarian. (...) Thank you, yes. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! (URL) in Deja News! (URL) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) I first looked into the JBS when I was 12. It starts off fairly reasonable, but goes nutty pretty fast. There are significant similarities in position, which have come about for wildly varying reasons, but I would not say congruence by any (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) Is. Although he won election(1) as a Republican (he was one before he converted) I wouldn't read too much into that. But I fail to see the connection. Libertarians are pro freedom. That doesn't mean being anti crime, but it does mean valuing (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) I think Jesse was refering to the fact the Ron Paul was (is?) a Libertarian. At least that's what it looked like to me. Jeff (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) I tried getting into the John Birch Society, but they kept getting in the way of my plans sell the good ol' U.S. of A. to Russia and implement my own communist New World Order run by bankers, Jews, and whatever gnomes of Zurich I happened to (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
For more information on privacy and the fight to protect it, go to ... (URL) John Birch Society -- Lee Jorgensen, Programmer/Analyst - Bankoe Systems, Inc. mailto:jorgensen@bankoe.moc <-- reverse moc mailto:ljorgensen@uswest.ten <-- reverse ten (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
|
|
(...) Spot on, Mike. Jesse, you might want to do some research on what this Know Your Customer rule actually required the banks to do, before you come out in favor of it. The constitution does guarantee us to be safe from unreasonable search and (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
