Subject:
|
Re: Bad News for Brickbay!?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.brickshops
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 02:40:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
632 times
|
| |
|
|
"Josh Baakko" <shi_web@hotmail.com> writes:
> I see no one has yet posted it here... I think:
> http://www.brickbay.com/message.asp?ID=5443
>
> Looks like Brickbay may have to move!?
>
> Conserned Brickbayer, Boycotting eBayer...
Ever since I first heard of Brickbay I have been wondering why this
hasn't happened sooner. It's so obvious that if there was no eBay,
BrickBay would never have been called that. It's clearly a trademark
violation.
But as I posted on the forum there, don't give up without a fight - if
eBay wants BrickBay to cease and desist, the least they can do is pay
for it. I think the BrickBay admins should sell the domain to eBay
for a big chunk o' change, and then buy a new domain with the
proceeds. Compared to the cost of a legal battle, it'll be cheap for
eBay to do.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bad News for Brickbay!?
|
| (...) Whatever they do, DO NOT offer to sell them the domain. That sort of behavior is one of the reasons the UDRP process has to determine if you registered the name in "bad faith." My personal opinion is that Brickbay does not infringe on eBay's (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.brickshops)
|
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
