Subject:
|
Re: TVLF 2000 Web page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:00:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
543 times
|
| |
|
|
lawrence wilkes <lawrence@thewilkesfamily.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Fwvs4z.B8K@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Huw Millington writes:
> > I was thinking more along the lines of elastic-power myself. Probably
> > modifying one of the sets that came out a couple of years ago.
>
> Ha, so its going to be one of those sail vs steam debates is it?
>
> Give me a 4 engined monster anyday.
>
> > How's this for some rules straight off:
> >
> > - 100% Lego - no foreign elastic bands for example!
> > - If battery powered, batteries must go with it
>
> Good rules.
> 2 classes. Electric and Elastic
>
> Also must complete 2 runs, one in each direction, so machines must be • robust
> enough to not fall apart when stopped.
How far? 10m?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: TVLF 2000 Web page up
|
| (...) Seems reasonable. I notice also references to new 'wind up' technic motors. Anyone used these? Would they be 'raceable' as they are part of the speed slammer stuff I presume regards lawrence (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: TVLF 2000 Web page up
|
| (...) Ha, so its going to be one of those sail vs steam debates is it? Give me a 4 engined monster anyday. (...) Good rules. 2 classes. Electric and Elastic Also must complete 2 runs, one in each direction, so machines must be robust enough to not (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
