Subject:
|
Re: NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:41:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
298 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Peter Parsons wrote:
| |
I forgot to add in my last post also that I find the “Post Heading” very
offensive “NR-75 The Ghan (The way it should have been done)” Now I know you
smiled at the end of it but I feel that Tim Gould posted the original Ghan
NR75 and you are saying in this very straight forward way that his version is
in some way wrong?? I feel you could have chosen a better choice in wording
and I know that Tim is a very easy going person and probably won’t take
offence at this. But I really think you owe Tim an appology for the way this
posting sounds. I would also recomend that you cahnge any future postings to
reflect “Your Ghan” and drop off the other bit.
|
Gee, I’m sorry you found it offensive. As Tim has already explained, this is a
bit of an inside joke, and I can see how the heading can come off as offensive
to anyone not in the know. Apologies.
Legoswami
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
