Subject:
|
Re: NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:49:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4733 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
| |
Hi me Peter again
I forgot to add in my last post also that I find the “Post Heading” very
offensive “NR-75 The Ghan (The way it should have been done)” Now I know you
smiled at the end of it but I feel that Tim Gould posted the original Ghan
NR75 and you are saying in this very straight forward way that his version
is in some way wrong?? I feel you could have chosen a better choice in
wording and I know that Tim is a very easy going person and probably won’t
take offence at this. But I really think you owe Tim an appology for the way
this posting sounds. I would also recomend that you cahnge any future
postings to reflect “Your Ghan” and drop off the other bit.
Regards
Peter Parsons
|
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the defense but don’t worry about the heading. It was a joke
between Samarth and myself. I was actually the other end of the 24hr build
challenge and we’ve been having a mini scale war off Lugnet for a while.
Of course the biggest joke is that Swami has the wrong scale ;)
Tim
|
Sorry to you both I didn’t know what was happening and I thought it sounded
rather “course” obviously stuck my foot in it please delete last posting
Cheers
To All
Peter
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
