To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 26043
26042  |  26044
Subject: 
Re: NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au
Date: 
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:39:06 GMT
Viewed: 
4095 times
  
--SNIP--
   Question to Swammi Mate where are the handrails you can’t just have “staunchions” sticking up in the air they really are dangerous and need a rail along the top.

To be fair to Swami, that was more my fault than his. I was rushing his renders and didn’t have time to learn Lsynth to add the flextube.

Thanks too for the compliments but my version took a lot longer than 24hrs to design and was then refined more with your help. A 24hr version would have been a lot crapper.

I do prefer six-wide and, as you say, no amount of scale argument can really shift my opinion. I just think it looks more right and I enjoy designing to the constraints of the scale but that’s individual preference and opinion. That said I did convert the 24hr Indian EMU which formed the other side of this challenge to seven-wide as it didn’t look right at six-wide.

Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
 
(...) Hi All I have to put my 20 cents worth in here as I have built the 6 wide NR 75 with many thanks to Tim for his help with prototyping issues and use of his instructions. 8 wide looks awfull but that is only my opinion far too out of scale no (...) (19 years ago, 16-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)

25 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR