Subject:
|
Re: NR-75 - The Ghan (The way it should have been done ;-) )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:34:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
271 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.trains, Samarth Moray wrote:
|
In lugnet.trains, Richie Dulin wrote:
|
Excellent work! Spotlighted. Thanks for sharing.
|
Thank you Community Member Richie Dulin for spotlighting my post! Your warm
services to the embracing community are much appreciated, as always.
|
Hi me Peter again
I forgot to add in my last post also that I find the Post Heading very
offensive NR-75 The Ghan (The way it should have been done) Now I know you
smiled at the end of it but I feel that Tim Gould posted the original Ghan NR75
and you are saying in this very straight forward way that his version is in some
way wrong?? I feel you could have chosen a better choice in wording and I know
that Tim is a very easy going person and probably wont take offence at this.
But I really think you owe Tim an appology for the way this posting sounds. I
would also recomend that you cahnge any future postings to reflect Your Ghan
and drop off the other bit.
Regards
Peter Parsons
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|