 | | Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | Hey all, Found my Fall 2001 S@H in the mail box today. Now that there are some new pictures to drool over, I'm making some observations. Grain of salt: Of course, specs on the sets may be a bit different from any pre-production/prototype photos, and (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | (...) WHOOPS! Hand slipped! On we go... 6) We had argued this point before, but I'm pretty sure now that at least SOME of the books ARE Scala/Belville scale...any other input? 7) The Final Challenge, notice that they don't show the sorcerers stone? (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) I'd say that yes, his head does glow. Not having read the books, I couldn't tell you why, though. (...) Good looking part, too, can't wait to get it. :) (...) Yep, as do I. The best of the new hair pieces, IMO. (...) I like the fact that the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) In the FBTB pics, Snape's head is plain grey, like Vader's head. Giving Snape a glowing head makes *zero* sense in context of the book, presumably the movie also. (I doubt the actor has a glowing head, neh?) My money is on no-glow. :) thanks, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yeah, but the green in two of the S@H Catalog pics is a) the same as the old ghosts, and b) not possible to get without intentional editing. So, my money is on glow. :) Besides, Troy got it today and confirmed that it does glow. :D Jeff (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Mrgh. Why the heck would they do that? :/ James (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) Does the door in 4704 "The Room of the Winged Keys" have a different window insert? I can't tell... (...) Hee-hee...kinda' phallic, huh? (...) Ah...you're right, I missed that...I was just looking at the glow Photoshopped in coming from behind (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) Looks to me like it doesn't have an insert at all.... (...) I ain't touching that comment with a four-foot flute! ;) (...) that (...) I could be wrong, but is seemed to make sense. ;) Jeff (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Troy Cefaratti
|
| | | | | | (...) window (...) This is correct, the door does not have an insert in 4704. What you are seeing is apparently somehting that is actually behind the door. Doesn't look like Lego was nice enough to include a spare insert either. Oh well, can't have (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) Or *CAN* we? Since this is a pretty silly omission for the line (and the usefulness of it as spare parts for anyones chosen theme...did the insert put the set over some piece count to price point ratio or something?), I think everyone should (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | (...) Aw, gee Matt! I thought we had settled the question about begging the question.... (URL) C. (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | (...) catagory of reasoning processes? It's not an antonym of reasoning? In the way I used it, it's NOT a verb facetiously inviting folks to reason out the meaning of a possibly glowing Snape head in the Harry Potter line, when there is no evidence (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | (...) Not at all... it belongs in the category of logical fallacy. (...) My apologies for missing your point. I guess I'm just one of those people who, when hearing the hoofbeats, thinks horses, not zebras. (...) Sometimes it's enough to make one (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Um, could you provide a sentence diagram for the above? I got lost in a maze of twisty little negations, all different, and now there's a dwarf throwing an ax... (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —John Gerlach
|
| | | | | (...) If you throw the axe back, the dwarf might disappear into a cloud of greasy black smoke... Man, does *that* bring back memories!! JohnG, GMLTC fut off-topic.fun (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | (...) Actually, in the interest of lack of imagination, I let the eye-biting monkey sit down at the keyboard, and...well, you know how he is... (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | (...) O.k. so I'm familiar with the ‘Eye-bitin’ Monkey!’ (Cause he’s a facet of my delusionary schizophrenic psyche.) But what’s going on with this “ dwarf throwing an ax” who can “disappear into a cloud of greasy black smoke...” What’s that?!? (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Ah, the youth of the world... This is a reference to the granddaddy of all computer RPG games: 'advent'. This game possibly predates your birth, it's a text adventure and it first ran on mainframes, although it was ported *everywhere* (1). The (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | (...) MAN LARRY! YOU *ARE* DATING YOURSELF! YOU ARE *OLD*! 8?D Seriously, I figured he was talking about Gauntlet, at the most... "The wizard needs food!" Hee-hee! Matt (Oh! the rabid eye-biting monkey makes his first appearence here: (URL) . The (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) I bet these young whippersnappers never had to write a program with &^%$#@! punchcards. In the snow! Uphill! Both ways! :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | Bruce & All, (...) I never had the "priviledge", but I had enough programming teachers in my high school and college days to tell us the stories, either funny, sad, and horrific, from the usual spilt the cards on the way to the final, to the too (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ah, the C64. I hear C64, and I still think "Stay a while. Stay forever!" :) James "C64's did something other than play cracked games?" Brown (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | | James & All, (...) Heh. I still have my C64, somewhere. I wonder if it still works? I wonder if the 5-1/4 floppies still work. I am pretty sure the cartridges do. My Atari 2600 still does. Now I just a PC emulator so I can download all my C-64 and (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) We have a bunch of old Namco classics on our N64. I *still* love DigDug... but I'm not any good at it any more. but I can top that. There is an active hobby around ROM emulators... you can download an emulator that will turn your high end PC (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Hee-hee! I used c64s in high school typing class...I've got a C128 in mothballs somewhere, and my prize computer collectable: A Tandy 1000, the original laptop computer, complete with Lucid spreadsheet cartridge and thermal printer! (My family (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) What, no Pong? <GD&R> James (who doesn't have pong, but did, once upon a time) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) No need to...darned if I didn't have a Pong clone (forget who made it, but it was a yellow boomerang, with sliders on either arm to move the paddles)...I destroyed it to make a prop for an early video production... For some reason, when I was (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) :) Ha! You were lucky! All I had was a Vic-20 with FIVE WHOLE KB of RAM. Actaully I upgraded it later to 32KB. Wow! Kevin (who also wrestled with punched cards and paper tape in earlier days) ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (...) (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hmmmph. Beaten by a VIC-20. My Apple ][+ had 16K, 10K of which was ROM. But then I had my TI-59 calculator with magnetic card reader and a whopping 960 (floating point) bytes!! Nyak, nyak!! Like to see *you* write a micro-chess (5x5) game on (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) BWAH-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA! To, to funny Bruce! Matt (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Given how recently you were in school and had English lessons, it's baffling(1) that you would get this wrong... it is "Too, too funny, Bruce!" unless you were giving someone directions and were using a "funny Bruce" as a landmark, that is. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) Dagnabbit! You're right...I try to keep those two (to, too) straight by remembering that the primary usage of too is to mean "in addition, also", so it looked funny when I typed it "too, too funny" (also, also funny?), so I went and changed (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | {~} Monkeys & Advent {~} —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | (...) Well, the tale of the ‘eye-bitin’ monkey’ may not have the illustrious past of 'advent,' but I'll be happy to direct you towards the path of mayhem. (URL) the bottom of this ^ post there is an outline of his adventures.] (...) BTW, I'm 21, is (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: {~} Monkeys & Advent {~} —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) The first version was done in 1972 i think. (...) The PET and the Apple and the TRS/80 model I all predate 1980, so ya. (...) When you see some, let us know. No enfeebled here. (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: {~} Monkeys & Advent {~} —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) I bought my Apple ][ in either 79 or 80 (it was the first week the ][+ was out, so I suppose I can date it from that). The Sol 20 and Exidy Sorcerer were also out around that time. I remember playing Star Trek on the mainframes at Long Beach (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) My own contribution is at (URL) not history). (...) I've only played it on PDP 11/70, IBM PC, and Sun workstation 8?( ROSCO (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
