To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 49521
49520  |  49522
Subject: 
Re: Most redundant Lego part
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:39:24 GMT
Viewed: 
4557 times
  
In lugnet.general, William Howard wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Gerhard R. Istok wrote:
> > Do you ever wonder sometimes why Lego developed some particular part and say • to yourself "what were they thinking?".
> > 
> > The one piece that comes to my mind is the 1x4x2 arch.  I mean it is
> > virtually identical to the 1x4 arch plus two 1x1 bricks attached to the
> > bottom of each end.
> 
> Functionally yes, aesthetically no.
> 
> If you're abutting 1x6x2 and 1x4 arches (in a colonade say -
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=531574) using 1x4 arches with
> 1x1 bricks to make up the height is just not as pleasing as using 1x4x2 arches -
> sorry but I don't like the extra seam that is introduced that breaks up the
> line.
> 
> And the great thing about aesthetics?  Even if you all disagree with me, I'm
> still right!  As beauty is in the eye of the beholder ;-)
> 
> William

Yes, but then TLG would need to create 1x4x4 arches if you want to make a
colonnade with 1x5x4 (half arches) and the 1x4 arches.  Or perhaps a 1x4x3 arch
to go along with the 1x12x3 arches in a colonnade.  Or if you wanted 1x6x2
arches with the 1x12x3 arch in a colonnade, they would have to make 1x6x3
arches.... :-)

I don't mind seams.  Most Lego buildings are full of them!  It's those
"umbilical cords" (where the Lego pellets were injected into the mold) that I
find unsightly.  Luckily they are predominantely on the top of studs of Lego
bricks today.  But in the 70's and 80's they were on the sides of Lego studs,
and I am always checking old bricks to make sure I don't leave one exposed on
the outside of whatever I am building.

Gary Istok



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Most redundant Lego part
 
(...) Functionally yes, aesthetically no. If you're abutting 1x6x2 and 1x4 arches (in a colonade say - (URL) using 1x4 arches with 1x1 bricks to make up the height is just not as pleasing as using 1x4x2 arches - sorry but I don't like the extra seam (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)

19 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR