Subject:
|
Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:52:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
825 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> It was when they juniorized the palm trees. In my mind, that's hard to top.
Yeah, that seemed really odd to me as well. Thinking on it from the other
direction, though, I've noticed that those little palm trunk segments can be
fairly tough to link together compared to basic bricks and such. Perhaps they
changed the trunk over because kids were injuring themselves when assembling
their palm trees. The palm leaves are probably a safety concern as well, as a
tipped-over palm tree has two pokey bits sticking up 4-5 inches in the air. The
thing that really sucks about this is that now all palm trees are always the
same height, and individual palm fronds are less common (though they'll probably
still use them in situations where they need to be attached to studded
surfaces).
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
| (...) You know, I'm actually starting to like palm tree junior. They are a lot quicker to set up and tear down and much harder to damage. Great for the Pirate Game which I am constantly packing into two bags of holding masquerading as suit cases... (...) (20 years ago, 1-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread: ![Most redundant Lego part -Gerhard R. Istok (24-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -James Stacey (24-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Ronald Borchert (24-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -William Howard (24-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -James Wilson (25-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Eric Strand (25-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Kevin Wilson (27-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -David Eaton (27-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![WOW!! -David Simmons (28-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: WOW!! -Steven D. Weiser (29-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: WOW!! -David Laswell (29-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Mike Kollross (2-Nov-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Mike Rayhawk (27-Oct-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Frank Filz (1-Nov-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Manfred Moolhuysen (2-Nov-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -James Stacey (5-Nov-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -William Howard (5-Nov-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Most redundant Lego part -Gerhard R. Istok (5-Nov-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|