Subject:
|
Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:52:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
872 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Gerhard R. Istok wrote:
> Do you ever wonder sometimes why Lego developed some particular part and say
> to yourself "what were they thinking?".
It was when they juniorized the palm trees. In my mind, that's hard to top.
- Mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
| (...) Yeah, that seemed really odd to me as well. Thinking on it from the other direction, though, I've noticed that those little palm trunk segments can be fairly tough to link together compared to basic bricks and such. Perhaps they changed the (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Most redundant Lego part
|
| Do you ever wonder sometimes why Lego developed some particular part and say to yourself "what were they thinking?". The one piece that comes to my mind is the 1x4x2 arch. I mean it is virtually identical to the 1x4 arch plus two 1x1 bricks attached (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
