Subject:
|
Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:34:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
917 times
|
| |
|
|
Gary Istok wrote:
> Do you ever wonder sometimes why Lego developed some particular part
> and say to yourself "what were they thinking?".
>
> The one piece that comes to my mind is the 1x4x2 arch. I mean it is
> virtually identical to the 1x4 arch plus two 1x1 bricks attached to
> the bottom of each end. Why was this even created? It would have
> been nice if the 1x4x2 was a pointed arch, but no, it was just like
> the regular 1x4 arch. Very much a redundant part. This is
> Juniorization at its' minimum.
>
> Any other redundancies folks can think of? (Except of course for
> those 1x1x5 and 1x2x5 bricks.)
>
> Gary Istok
>
> A Lego addict since 1960.
How about http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/30100. 'Panel Double Wall 3 x 6 x
6'
It appears in one set (apart from a brief Dacta appearance) and whilst its a
handy part to have, the function it performs in the only set it is in could
equally well be done by 2 of these http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/2345
'Panel Wall 3 x 3 x 6 Corner' as the only difference is the window which is
covered up in the only set it apears in. Maybe I'm being unfair, as Lego
have provided a nice piece, but they never actually used it as intended in a
set.
--
James Stacey
------
www.minifig.co.uk
Lugnet Member #925
I'm a citizen of Legoland travellin' Incommunicado
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Most redundant Lego part
|
| Do you ever wonder sometimes why Lego developed some particular part and say to yourself "what were they thinking?". The one piece that comes to my mind is the 1x4x2 arch. I mean it is virtually identical to the 1x4 arch plus two 1x1 bricks attached (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
