 | | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
In lugnet.general, Gregory Muri wrote: snipped for redundancy's sake (...) From Lugnet Terms of Use Agreement: (URL) (do not) Post or re-post a message excessively 12. (do not) Stray hopelessly off-topic without moving the discussion to a more (...) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) I agree with Nick. -Tim (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) I agree. I get tired of each new thread Jake starts turning into a color complaint. It makes it difficult to enjoy reading a thread. That's probably why I had an edge to the words in my first reply to him. (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
I don't see this as ruining anything. I have read some very interesting posts with the direction this thread has gone. Some things have even given me perspective I had not previously considered. Why should you care, just don't read it! There are (...) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
And I get equally tired of responses like this one so I suppose we are all just tired. Greg "Rocco J Carello" <rogue27@mac.com> wrote in message news:HxDABH.1FA2@lugnet.com... (...) all (...) new (...) probably why (...) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) That's it. Tell customer service what you think. As for the rest of us, we already know, cause you've already told us...and told us...and told us. -Tim (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) But telling Consumer Affairs is telling it to a black hole. It does nothing. However, as Jake has noted, TLG employees read Lugnet. So stating it here again....and again...and again {might} finally make it sink in as to how important it is to (...) (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Jake has told me, and I believe he's told the group here on LUGNET, that Consumer Affairs *does* track this information and *does* relay it to the appropriate department. But, I suppose that might not be good enough for people who "can never (...) (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) nothing. (...) important (...) Well stated Tom! (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:409C2822.F2FCB9...faq.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) nothing. (...) important (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I disagree. There comes a point when saying the same thing over and over again (...) (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Yup. Spotlighted. (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) ... snipped ... (...) Now I disagree. While this may true for the readers at LUGNET, how much of this so-called "noise" is actually reaching TLG? No one at TLG (besides Jake) is reading all of these color-change complaints. Sometimes, when the (...) (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Wanna bet? I think you have *no idea* how many people at TLG do or don't read LUGNET, or where they sit in the corporate hierarchy, or whether the thread is actually doing more harm than good or not. I don't have much better info than you do, (...) (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
In lugnet.general, Nick Kappatos wrote: snip (...) This is "the friendliest place on the Internet"?!? (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) I was thinking that too, but in a much different context than what you quoted for your cite. I don't exactly equate nonstop harping, personal attacks, thread hijacks, and general bitterness with friendliness. I think Nick would like to keep it (...) (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Maybe. It may also drive more and more people away from lugnet, as all the ranting is so infuriating to read. For the moment, lugnet is worse than having to listen to my two teenage boys quarreling. (Back to www.tt-forums.net for something (...) (20 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) I can most definately confirm this. Usually after posting links to/pictures of a new MOC I have hosted on my own websites visits coming from the lego.com domain start appearing usually the next day... (20 years ago, 9-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) AFOL means "Adult Fan of LEGO." Clearly you are no longer a fan of LEGO. So please go away so that the rest of us can have our LUGNET back. --Bill. (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Had you read (URL) this post> by Greg, you might have noticed this: As far as leaving, keep dreaming. Just because I am no longer a Lego customer, on a retail level, doesn't mean I am giving up on my enjoyment of what I have or the hobby in (...) (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) I think you can be a fan of the system without being a fan of the company. And I think you can be a fan of the company without being a fan of every decision that it takes. So I don't agree that Greg is no longer an AFOL. (...) I don't want (...) (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) I'm not sure how anything can be off-topic for .general, considering things like "rumors, musings, weird dreams" are on-topic. But without getting bogged down in what should be posted where... Greg's original point was that he didn't like the (...) (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Marc Nelson, Jr. wrote: [Much snippage] (...) Discuss colors, great. It's the force and vitriol with which it's being done, in my view. I keep up with many AFOLs across the whole community on a daily basis, and I think 95% told me (...) (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) General is two things, in my view... (1) a place for initial announcements of general interest (which should have FUT set elsewhere, the same way .announce posts do) and a place to discuss things that don't have anywhere else to go. If a (...) (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
