Subject:
|
Re: New Sets 2003
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:33:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
867 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Thomas Garrison writes:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Huw Millington wrote:
>
> > "Holger Matthes" <matthes@fh-aachen.de> wrote in message
> > news:H3r4D0.4Kw@lugnet.com...
> > > Hi all,
> > > ...
> > > shows the new sets form 2003.
> >
> > Are we supposed to be discussing leaked information on Lugnet? I thought it
> > was expressly forbidden (somewhere in this thread
> > http://news.lugnet.com/announce/?n=706&t=i&v=b)
>
> I thought
> http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=20866
> specified only that confidential information should not be disclosed in
> the public forum that is LUGNET. Have there been any indications that
> this information is confidential? Catalog scans are common enough---it's
> only if the catalog was specifically not supposed to be released to the
> public that LUGNET objects. Granted, I wasn't looking for a
> "CONFIDENTIAL" watermark, but the pictures looked innocuous. . .
It looked to me like a dealer's catalogue. I haven't seen one of
those before, certainly not in German, but a true catalogue for
public consumption would look very different than one that simply
shows off the products for potential market buyers. My guess would
be that it wasn't something that was supposed to be shown, and
as soon as TLC got wind of it they demanded it be taken down. I'm
not surprised, really.
Of course, I went and looked (luckily I checked in at the right time,
not easy these days on dialup for me), so I got a sneak peek that was
very, very exciting. Neat! (But no, I'm not going to pull them out
of my browser cache, so please don't email me asking to see them.)
all best
LFB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Sets 2003
|
| (...) I have seen one dealer's catalog last year at a local toy shop, and it's pretty much like this (or even simpler in looks). There are lots of appendixes with prices on the last pages. Pedro (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
| (...) (URL) only that confidential information should not be disclosed in the public forum that is LUGNET. Have there been any indications that this information is confidential? Catalog scans are common enough---it's only if the catalog was (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
