Subject:
|
Re: New Sets 2003
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:24:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
787 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Huw Millington wrote:
> "Holger Matthes" <matthes@fh-aachen.de> wrote in message
> news:H3r4D0.4Kw@lugnet.com...
> > Hi all,
> > ...
> > shows the new sets form 2003.
>
> Are we supposed to be discussing leaked information on Lugnet? I thought it
> was expressly forbidden (somewhere in this thread
> http://news.lugnet.com/announce/?n=706&t=i&v=b)
I thought
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=20866
specified only that confidential information should not be disclosed in
the public forum that is LUGNET. Have there been any indications that
this information is confidential? Catalog scans are common enough---it's
only if the catalog was specifically not supposed to be released to the
public that LUGNET objects. Granted, I wasn't looking for a
"CONFIDENTIAL" watermark, but the pictures looked innocuous. . .
--
TWS Garrison
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/
Remove capital letters in address for direct reply.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Sets 2003
|
| (...) It looked to me like a dealer's catalogue. I haven't seen one of those before, certainly not in German, but a true catalogue for public consumption would look very different than one that simply shows off the products for potential market (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
| "Holger Matthes" <matthes@fh-aachen.de> wrote in message news:H3r4D0.4Kw@lugnet.com... (...) Are we supposed to be discussing leaked information on Lugnet? I thought it was expressly forbidden (somewhere in this thread (URL) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
