To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 35330
35329  |  35331
Subject: 
Re: Bad News for Brickbay!?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.general
Date: 
Sat, 26 Jan 2002 11:20:54 GMT
Viewed: 
53 times
  
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Calum Tsang (<GqIJsD.HKr@lugnet.com>) wrote at
21:31:25
<snip>
At that, this is the same as Larry defending his Guild of Bricksmiths
(tm-just to make his day).  If one believes Larry is within his rights to
defend his trademark and protect it,

Just butting in to say that it isn't Larry's trademark. The mark belongs
to the Guild of Bricksmiths(tm).  :-)

Carry on.
--
Tony Priestman



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Bad News for Brickbay!?
 
(...) Right. Thanks, it did need pointing out. You can substitute Milton Train Works(tm) as an example of a personal trademark of mine if you like, or change "his trademark" to "the group's trademark" if you like, and either way it stands. (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bad News for Brickbay!?
 
(...) Actually, they have plenty of legal ground. Again, similarly, I am not a lawyer. (And also a Canadian!) But I have been to lectures about intellectual property, and it is my understanding that trademark infringement is based on similar service (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.general)

41 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR