Subject:
|
Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:49:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1342 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes:
> I don't *want* to buy Megablocks... I want to buy LEGO sets of the same
> calibre. However, until the current quality matches the once golden
> reputation I will be very careful how I spend my dollars.
Mmm. Well. At least it is only the set design, and not the product itself
that has our opinions on the downslope. ...Whoa! Now you hold on there TLC!
Don't you dare think about changing your recipe for high precision molded ABS!!
<smirk & grimace>
....<MAJOR knocking on wood>....
-H.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
|
| (...) Agreed. You might go so far as to say one of the only things holding sales up is that some of the sets being sold contain some original style bricks which are still made of the original recipe. But of course my argument is that if the sets (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
|
| (...) Disagree. Seems like in the last year or two, I've experienced (and heard about) many more problems with the bricks - warped pieces, mismolded parts, parts without 'clutch power' - than in previous years. I think LEGO has definitely cut (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
|
| (...) My turn to disagree. :) I think they haven't had nearly enough constructive criticism here on LUGNET. Sure they've had some. Just do a search on my name and you'll find 20 or 30 posts in the last few months on this exact topic. But I wonder (...) (23 years ago, 11-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|