|
I'm gonna stick my nose in here, and say I agree whole hartedly.
besides that you can now save money :-) I haven't bought anything from lego
in aprox 9 monthes. of coarse I'm going into my dark ages, so you might have
different results with not getting lego sets.
my point being is that this isn't completely bad.
Gary
Lawrence Wilkes <lawrence@thewilkesfamily.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:GMn9Eo.CJo@lugnet.com...
>
> "Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@altavista.net> wrote in message news:GMn6Cr.5y0@lugnet.com...
> > > In lugnet.general, Lawrence Wilkes writes:
> > > 2002 catalogue. Oh dear, dear, dear. Where did it all go so wrong?
> > >
> > > Sorry, I am disappointed so much I cant even be bothered to tell you why.
> >
> > Lawrence... if I may make a suggestion....
> >
> > Take a moment (or two) to tell the company exactly what it is that's
> > bothering you about the catalog. Make it positive, but don't be afraid to
> > be stern.
> >
> > Simply telling them that you're unhappy does not give them the opportunity
> > to fix things. They need input and direction.
>
> They have had all the input and direction they need via Lugnet.
> My thoughts aren't too dissimilar to many others here.
>
> I can't see Lego having reacted positively to the points that I and others have raised here many times.
> But that's Lego's choice if they choose to ignore it.
>
> Anyway, as I said I am so disappointed in Lego these days I cant be bothered to tell them anymore as it seems to fall on
> deaf ears.
>
> I am the customer. It is not my job to tell them what to build - well certainly not over and over ad infinitum as we
> seem to here.
> If I dont like what they produce then I will simply take my custom and my money elsewhere.
> Their loss.
> But I guess I just don't fit into their target market profile much any more, so they probably don't care.
>
> > I am confident that they can change things. They would have to work pretty
> > hard to continue the slide they're on now. :)
>
> Sorry, but I cannot agree.
> The 2002 catalog seems to just reinforce the fact they are sliding from construction toy to action toy maker.
> I dont want action toys. But if I did then there are far, far, far better ones out there than Lego are making.
>
> And I dont think Lego want to change this trend. It seems to be working for them as a company, so good luck to them.
> Profit seems the only motivation nowadays, and I dont totally disagree with that sentiment either. They are not a
> charity. Nor am I
>
> It's just that me and Lego seem to be on diverging paths. The only part that interests me anymore is bulk bricks and
> some aspects of Lego Direct (like trains), yet that seems way down their list of priorities.
>
> I can carry on building MOCs with the bricks I have of course, but without something new once in a while to excite me, I
> might end up loosing interest in that too.
>
> lawrence
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|