| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > You'd have to trust the program, of course -- that it wouldn't sneakily upload
> > the model as well as the parts list. If you don't have the source code to the
> > program or you aren't able to reverse-engineer it, lord knows what it's doing.
>
> ...which goes back to the idea of designing a "dummy model" out of the parts
> you want, and sending that. You get the parts you want, and TLC comes nowhere
> near the model you don't want them to have.
Agreed. It just seems a waste of effort, because presumably first you had to
design the real one to find out what parts you needed (or build a real one,
but in either case, divine the needed parts).
Someone may write a mixmaster program to stir up a model, I guess.
I'd rather that TLC give the option of submitting or not submitting to the
public lib when you upload/create the design, and that we have sufficient
reason to trust that they're not going to dishonor the request.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) Could be useful even with the below. Would also be simple. Just take the parts list and line em up. (...) Assuming they don't create a contract which gives them any rights automatically, the "sufficient trust" need not be much more than a well (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
