|
Gary Istok wrote:
> It sounds like this method could be useful for bulk orders as well. All you would
> have to do is stack up the parts/colors you want (via LEGO/CAD) without having to
> assemble them into a structure. The whole "building" issue could be moot.
Ahh, yes. Another use for the scrambler. Give it the parts list you
want, and have it emit a model using them to upload to TLC to place your
order.
If TLC is smart, they will have the input be a parts list, and then tell
us how to upload just a parts list. Why go to any effort of having a
complete model when we're just going to work around it, and at some
point they need just the parts list. Provide the CAD program as one way
of generating a parts list.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) Because some of use aren't so uptight about model designs that we feel the need to "protect" them from TLC, and would actually very much *like* to have instructions for our models, without having to suffer through an anitquated home-brewed CAD (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) It sounds like this method could be useful for bulk orders as well. All you would have to do is stack up the parts/colors you want (via LEGO/CAD) without having to assemble them into a structure. The whole "building" issue could be moot. Gary (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|