| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
>
> > Because some of use aren't so uptight about model designs that we feel
> > the need
> > to "protect" them from TLC, and would actually very much *like* to have
> > instructions for our models, without having to suffer through an anitquated
> > home-brewed CAD program to create them.
>
> Well, the data format is a bit arcane but I'm not sure I'd characterise
> MLCad (to pick my favorite) as "antiquated"... it's pretty slick.
I have to admit, my LEGO CAD experience is limited to a single program. I
picked what appeared to be the most popular and best supported, and dove in.
Way too user-unfriendly, IMHO, so I didn't bother to check out what seemed to
be the bit players.
If it ever came down to it, I would probably go Gianluca Morelli's route first.
:D
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) Well, the data format is a bit arcane but I'm not sure I'd characterise MLCad (to pick my favorite) as "antiquated"... it's pretty slick. But that's just my opinion, of course. It's been years since I last played with AutoCAD. I'd ask this, is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
