To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 21612
21611  |  21613
Subject: 
Re: Anyone heard this story yet?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:47:21 GMT
Viewed: 
832 times
  
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.general, Matthew Miller writes:

Sorry but I just have to throw my 2 cents in here.  IMHO this is TLC's own
darn fault.  It shows their incompitance when it comes to the internet.

Agreed. In this particular case, it seems pretty logical that
"legolandwindsor" is probably associated with the Lego theme park with a
similar name.

I wonder though; how can they be expected to police all misuse of their > name in a case like this?

By having an ever vigilant,  and understanding AFOL community?

If they copyright legolandwindsor.com, what's to prevent
some knucklehead from using "legoland-windsor.com" or "legoland_windsor.com"
or even "lego-windsor.com"?  Realistically, and in all seriousness, how can
any corporation, even an incompetent one, hope to guard against all these
permutations of its name?

Point-taken, but there is an issue of possible  "abuse" of trademarks here.
If a site registered as http://the_lego_sales_shop.com and only sold clone
bricks that would in IMHO be illegal. ( misleadig advertising?)..

Persoanlly I think there should be a way of letting Lego know about
potential cybersqautting on and misuse of 'sensitve' names.

(lugnet.lego.tradmarks_abuse, Todd?)

Alex.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Anyone heard this story yet?
 
(...) Right. That's both illegal and smarmy. Just registering the domain with the hope of selling it to Lego also under the new law illegal and definitely smarmy (although having that be illegal sort of troubles me -- just because it's not nice, or (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Anyone heard this story yet?
 
(...) I wonder though; how can they be expected to police all misuse of their name in a case like this? If they copyright legolandwindsor.com, what's to prevent some knucklehead from using "legoland-windsor.com" or "legoland_windsor.com" or even (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)

37 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR