To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 16438
16437  |  16439
Subject: 
Re: If TLG was going to cease production of any 5 pieces which ones should they be?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:47:02 GMT
Viewed: 
1122 times
  
In lugnet.general, Aaron Hines writes:
No no no no no... he means this nasty thing:
http://home.earthlink.net/~mesteele/images/archway.jpg
Alan
Random set: <set:8480>

AAAAAGH!
(Covers eyes)
(Peeks through fingers at the monstrosity)
AAAAAAAAAAAGH!

Seriously, that is a horrid POOP!  Give me four half arches, six inverse
slopes and some extra 1x2s anyday over that thing!

Technically not a POOP, as it couldn't be made from other parts - not and
still have a portcullis drop through it.

That being said, though, it's still an ugly waste of ABS, and I despise it
almost to the same degree as the 1 piece palm tree.

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
I'm getting paid for this --> alladvantage.com
Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: If TLG was going to cease production of any 5 pieces which ones should they be?
 
(...) AAAAAGH! (Covers eyes) (Peeks through fingers at the monstrosity) AAA...AAAGH! Seriously, that is a horrid POOP! Give me four half arches, six inverse slopes and some extra 1x2s anyday over that thing! Aaron (Changed my mind about the 2x2x11 (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)

29 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR