| |
In lugnet.dear-lego, Allister McLaren wrote:
| |
In lugnet.dear-lego, Chris Phillips wrote:
| |
The studless beams have their place, but they are not a perfect replacement
for studded beams in all circumstances. A studded beam can almost always be
used in place of a studless one, but the reverse is not true. If I wanted
to place artificial roadblocks in my own way, it would be cheaper and easier
to just switch over to MegaBlocks.
And the NXT itself, being the top-of-the-line LEGO brick, doesn’t have a
single trademark LEGO stud anywhere on it. I was under the impression that
MindStorms was an offshoot of Technic, not Bionicle.
|
whinge whinge whinge.
It’s not even a new whinge. The studdless ‘debate’ has been ongoing for years
as far as I can tell. What’s next? A whinge about Town Junior?
|
Allister,
You are getting somewhat off-topic for both this newsgroup and this thread.
Perhaps you would like to bring your fascinating insights over to a more
relevant newsgroup where we can all ignore you in peace?
FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Where Have All the Studs Gone?
|
| (...) You should be grateful anyone responds to your blithering at all. Seems to me everyone else moved on from the studless whinge ages ago, and apparently don't particularly want to go there again. This thread lost relevance after the first post, (...) (18 years ago, 5-Dec-06, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Where Have All the Studs Gone?
|
| (...) whinge whinge whinge. It's not even a new whinge. The studdless 'debate' has been ongoing for years as far as I can tell. What's next? A whinge about Town Junior? (18 years ago, 5-Dec-06, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
