Dear LEGO : 5019


Dear LEGO / 5019	5018 \| 5020

Subject:	Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego
Date:	Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:47:36 GMT
Viewed:	378 times

Looking for the edge could trigger TLC to feel a need imposing restrictions more severe than the current ones. So please consider, there is a risk you’re going to make things harder for the rest of us.

I disagree - both about using “l3go” and about greater restrictions. Pushing towards an edge means that TLG will need to delinate it more clearly - which means less grey area.

as for the “l3go”, i think your average user would think something like ‘l three g o? what does that mean?’ - and your average nettie would realize the 1337, and thus know that TLG would never use 1337 in their webnames. so, i would suppose it would be okay, but you’re right - it is pushing the limits.

-Lenny

Message has 1 Reply:

		Grey zone debate wanted! (was: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?)
Well, I believe that that big grey zone is there because the people at TLC is just as uncertain on how to place the boundary as we are; not to terrorize us with having a secret boundary to sit behind anxiously waiting for the opportunity to punish (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
Hello Niels, (...) To me a name as l3go seems like getting as close to the edge as possible. Prehaps it's just (bearly) enough to be legal (but I'm not even sure about that), but it's certainly against the spirit of the rule. Looking for the edge (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)

18 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search