| |
Niels Bugge wrote:
> However, to avoid mixing my page up wit my father's I need a new subdomain, and
> am wondering if l3go is far enough off? - I doubt that outsiders would recognize
> it as having something to do with lego, while insiders would understand it as a
> relevant name, but still looking unofficial. And it has a nice pun to it,
> turning the page 3vil... It already has black background, and we all know that
> Vader is the real hero of SW...
What about OGEL, 0931, 1390 or such? These are not their trademarks, at
least I haven't found them on USPTO.
You can search their trademarks here
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=bimkf1.1.1
just enter 'Kirkbi' and 'Owner name'.
Heh, I've seen there: Jack Stone - Dead. ;-)))
Jindroush
www.kostky.org - For Czech LEGO fans.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
| Dear all First of all I'll thank Jake for settling the question wether lego in subdomains is legal or not. Secondly I'll thank everybody (and especially Michael) for taking the time to explain why: Being immersed in the busienss of domain names and (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
