To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 6104
6103  |  6105
Subject: 
Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 04:11:18 GMT
Viewed: 
6265 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee wrote:
   In lugnet.lego.direct, Niels Bugge wrote:
   To Jake McKee or somebody else who can speak on behalf of TLC:

After the presentation of my webpage www.lego.bugge.com, I’ve received a lot of warnings against legal problems with TLC based on the Fair Play Policy.

   www.lego.mysite.com = bad

I just wanted to add while I am fairly net savy, and I first thought www.lego.bugge.com was related to TLG somehow - like Pitsco, or something. Mainly because ‘lego’ came before ‘bugge’ and because I dont know what ‘bugge’ refers to. For all i know, its a danish word.

-Lenny



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
 
(...) Yes, using the word "LEGO" anywhere in the domain or sub-domain is a no-no. It's the full Internet address as you quote from the Fair Play, not just the root domain. Confusion about ownership of the site can still result even if "LEGO" is in (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR