To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 6099
6098  |  6100
Subject: 
Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:31:31 GMT
Viewed: 
6100 times
  
To Jake McKee or somebody else who can speak on behalf of TLC:

After the presentation of my webpage www.lego.bugge.com, I’ve received a lot of warnings against legal problems with TLC based on the Fair Play Policy.

A search on the subject here on lugnet hasn’tofficial statement from TLC-affiliated people that can shed light on the question; the only place I’ve seen subdomains mentioned is in a post by Tobbe Arnesson http://news.lugnet.com/modelteam/?n=953 claiming that using lego in subdomains is illegal based on the Fair Play Policy which, however, doesn’t mention anything about subdomains, only domains:

   The LEGO Trademark cannot be used in an Internet Address
The LEGO trademark should not be incorporated into an Internet address. Internet addresses have become useful tools for people to identify the source of a homepage. Using “LEGO” in the domain name would be creating the misleading impression that the LEGO Group sponsored the homepage.

Frankly I would be really surprised if TLC should show any interest in interfering with what a private person decides to do with his legally bought domain name (without lego), with a reference to avoid “creating the misleading impression that the LEGO Group sponsored the homepage”, as a subdomain such as mine only can be considered ‘sponsored’ by the owner of www.bugge.com and therefore clearly family business.

I might be wrong, but I really like the address and I’ve spend many, many hours creating nedstatcounters for all pages, and I wouldn’t like to throw all that work away based on hearsay. So what I’d really like to have is an official statement settling the matter (and if it’s illegal, an explanation why): Because until I know if the address is ok, I can’t really advertise the page on the internet or upload new parts (with reference to the newest emailaddress shown on the webpage) to the Ldraw PT as this would only make it even more difficult to move the page to another address (like l3go.bugge.com).

So basically I’m stuck until this question is settled.

-NB



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
 
"Niels Bugge" <buggelego2@+antiSPAMmail. dk> wrote in message news:I8Co0J.87r@lugnet.com... (...) lot (...) I've (...) subdomains (...) (URL) Fair Play Policy> which, however, doesn't mention anything about subdomains, (...) source (...) bought (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
 
Hi, (...) Sure enough. I think that your Page violates the Fair Play Policy. (...) Well. What do you think is www.lego.bugge.com? I think it is an internet address. Can you tell me, how the normal, fairly computer literate surfer or a kid searching (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
 
(...) Yes, using the word "LEGO" anywhere in the domain or sub-domain is a no-no. It's the full Internet address as you quote from the Fair Play, not just the root domain. Confusion about ownership of the site can still result even if "LEGO" is in (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR