 | | Minifigures in Legoland
|
|
An old family friend called round my house a week or so with her children (3 boys between 7 and 13) - keep with me, this is on topic honest, They live down in Cornwall and hadn't been to south wales before. The 3 boys are all huge Lego fans and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego) !
|
| |
| | Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
|
|
I'm gonna stick my nose in here, and say I agree whole hartedly. besides that you can now save money :-) I haven't bought anything from lego in aprox 9 monthes. of coarse I'm going into my dark ages, so you might have different results with not (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Contact for a small complain, and some feedback
|
|
(...) Hi Martin, I agree with you. In fact, if TLC is trying so hard to save on packaging, why not return to the old style? The cardboard was thinner, and the box inside could be re-used for storage... I still have some from my older sets that I use (...) (23 years ago, 11-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Contact for a small complain, and some feedback
|
|
(...) Hi Mike, Thank you for the reply. You know, now that you mention it, I remember having read this post some time ago, I just hadn't yet ordered my K10001... so I did not pay much attention to it. So TLC *knows* about this mistake, and they (...) (23 years ago, 11-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Goodbye Lego and thanks for all the bricks
|
|
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:GMn6Cr.5y0@lugnet.com... (...) They have had all the input and direction they need via Lugnet. My thoughts aren't too dissimilar to many others here. I can't see Lego having (...) (23 years ago, 11-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Contact for a small complain, and some feedback
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Pedro Silva writes: [Snip] (...) [Snip] I have a similar complaint about several newer sets e.g. 8466, in which the instructions were mangled up because of the way the boxes are now packed. I know it is done to save on (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Contact for a small complain, and some feedback
|
|
"Pedro Silva" <el_gordo@netc.pt> wrote in message news:GMK5wH.7tr@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) the (...) upseting, (...) the (...) [ ... snipped ... ] The blue windows is an acknoledged error and there is a solution. See this: (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Contact for a small complain, and some feedback
|
|
Hi, I have a small complain regarding my newly acquired Metroliner kit, and I'd like to know who I should e-mail about it. The catches are: - I live in Portugal, where S@H isn't yet available. So I had to ask Belgian friends to buy the set, and (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) Amen! I'm not posting this message as a "response" to your response but more as a direct post to Lego. I didn't want to say anything but I recently had a nightmare of an experience with the Customer "Service" Representatives at the S & H 800 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
(...) The lugnet.dear-lego group is for posting open letters to TLC, not for debates. Richard's original post in this thread was on-topic to the group. At this point, however, both of you are straying pretty wildly off-topic for the group. Please (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
Hi Richard - "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GMJ85G.9KB@lugnet.com... (...) My thoughts are - just keep persistent at the constructive criticism. Allan mentioned that he was committed to whining and complaining until (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
(...) And you think there are ways to get through to them that work? Do tell... (...) Yes, and I have given such thanks over the Guarded Inn, for example. Of course the devil is in the details -- I wasn't quite as pleased to actually receive the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GMIFnJ.37@lugnet.com... (...) Fine, disturb may have been the wrong word to use. But, it still upsets me in the sense that I believe its futile and not the kind of message that will get (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | foo!
|
|
(...) Which disturbed you then and disturbs you now? C'mon? Reread it, it's not that harsh -- except for maybe the subject line. Disturbs? I think you aren't actually losing any sleep over it, Tim. ;o) Anyway, you know what I owe TLC? Nothing. For (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) I completely agree with you. That was why I prefaced my comments with this statement: +++...+++ (...) +++...+++ (...) Well... I have mixed feelings about this stance. Normally I'm considered a very reasonable person. More than once co-workers (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:GMI9n7.8q1@lugnet.com... (...) I recall a discussion I had with a couple of them towards the beginning of the year when Richard was commenting quite harshly then too. When I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: TLC declares Bankruptcy!
|
|
(...) I don't like to speak for anyone else, so let me answer your question from my own perspective. Many of my recent posts have been similar in their critical nature, though more subdued in their tone. And the reason is simple. I am sick and tired (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) I agree, his tone might have been a bit harsh... there are probably ways to express these feelings and maintain a little more integrity. (...) Well... good. I hope you're right. Maybe some of this dissatisfaction might eventually trickle up (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: TLC declares Bankruptcy! (Kristiansen's unfurl golden parachute...)
|
|
If you're that disappointed with TLC then why not sell your stuff and find a new hobby? (...) But they do still release bricks, and they've realised their error of judgement with Znap. (...) course): That's right. They're more durable now, and in (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) Didn't you know? Hop-Frog specializes in Vehemence. No halfway measures for him, no sir! If he decides to feel something, he feels it beyond all reasonable limits, and darned if he isn't going to make sure we all Know His Ire. Chill, dude. :) (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
