| |
In lugnet.dear-lego, Tim Courtney wrote:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Richard Marchetti wrote:
> > [...]
> > BTW, I do think they read these posts -- if for no other reason than
> > because someone as genteel as Tim Courtney responded to it. Thank you
> > very much. But if they would otherwise blow it off, then they do me a
> > disservice -- no one but an admirer of their products would have written
> > that post to begin with.
> [...]
> ...because without the angry silliness it has a good message behind it.
> Didn't I say that I believe what you're trying to say is right on, but your
> methods are misguided?
>
> > Tell ya what though, if Todd Lehman, Suzanne Rich, Steve Bliss, or either
> > of the two Bogers asks me to tone it down -- I will. I will bow to the
> > administrators of Lugnet.
>
> I'm intimidated by your use of those names. Please stop. <grin>
>
> No seriously, I don't think I can actually tell you to stop and be obeyed.
> I don't think I have some sort of authority over what you post at all. I am
> excercising my right to share my opinion about LEGO and about the way you
> are giving them feedback. Feel free to ignore me.
> [...]
> Might be a more constructive use of your time.
The lugnet.dear-lego group is for posting open letters to TLC, not for
debates. Richard's original post in this thread was on-topic to the group.
At this point, however, both of you are straying pretty wildly off-topic for
the group.
Please continue the discussion off-line or in a group more appropriate to
the argument at hand (such as lugnet.general, a themed group, etc.).
Thanks.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: foo!
|
| "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GMIFnJ.37@lugnet.com... (...) Fine, disturb may have been the wrong word to use. But, it still upsets me in the sense that I believe its futile and not the kind of message that will get (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
