| |
richard marchetti wrote:
>
> In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Parsons writes:
> > Even if Todd was being unreasonable (which he's not), that's fine, its his site!
>
> I have a real problem with Lugnet being considered Todd and Suzanne's
> exclusive sandbox -- in reality, it is and it isn't depending on what part
> we are examining. People contribute time, money, content, scans, etc. It
> strikes me as a community effort in MANY ways. It's a little too heavy in
> attitude to just assert that we cannot support clones brands in some way in
> the database and to provide no reasons for this posture.
No reasons?..:-) What do you think that this "L" of Lugnet stands
for?..:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
