| |
Yes, I agree with Dan. I think a link to an off-site database or clone portal would be very useful information. Even the rtl LEGO FAQ page had a section of clones information.
http://www.multicon.de/fun/legofaq.html#a16
But no, I find no reason that the database or any other information besides the clone-brands group should be hosted by Lugnet.
Another issue is: how many people have posted to the clone-brands group, cross-postings in the "Are you paying attention..." thread not counted? Let me guess. 15? 20?
/Tore
Dan Boger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 10:25:29AM +0000, richard marchetti wrote:
> > I realize that Lugnet is owned by two persons, and is not a democracy -- but
> > I think that there are many Lugnet users that would be grateful to have
> > access to clone information when they need it.
> >
> > I can contribute a handful of scanned instructions myself...
> >
> > Does a consensus of Lugnet users in favor of creating such a clone database
> > matter at all in this decision, Todd?
>
> personally, I think there's no room for such a DB on lugnet. If you want to start up your own DB offsite, then perhaps Todd would put a link from off-topic.clones to your DB - but I don't think it should be on site.
>
> --
> Dan Boger / dan@peeron.com / www.peeron.com / ICQ: 1130750
> <set:918_1>: Space Transport (LEGO/SYSTEM/Space/Classic), '78, 85 pcs, 1 figs
--
Tore Eriksson
Sweden
ICQ: 76066510
LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
