Subject:
|
Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 01:36:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
859 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Aaron West writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Aaron West writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > >
> > > > Yeah, yer right! Cool, actual female armor!
> > >
> > > People, she is just wearing a *tight* blue dress, nooo armor (she's got
> > > cleavage!) with a shawl (spelling?) or sweatery thing over her shoulders.
> > > She ain't no warrior chick.
> > > Aaron>maniac@vol.com
> >
> > Look at the knight by the ramp up to the gate. It's a she. You can tell by
> > the obviously red lips. :)
> >
> > Jeff
> Perhaps you have a larger picture than I do, but I have to say that the only
> female I see is on the top of the tower of 6091. The knight by the gate shows
> no obvious female characteristics. In fact, with that style helm on, how can
> you say for sure (unless you have a larger picture) that it is not a
> mustache? Holding with LEGO sets of the past I will have to wait until I see
> a larger photo or the actual product before I say that the only knight other
> than the King Leo is a woman (no offense, but I don't believe LEGO would have
> a helpless female and a warrior female in the same set.). Your "obvoiusly red
> lips" are most likely a mustache of red or brown color.
My Reasons (may not be enough for you, though):
A. I own The Catalog;
B. I looked at it under magnification;
C. If that is a Mustache, the knight has no mouth and a very long face;
D. It looks an awful lot like the Pirate Wench's Head;
E. The Eyes appear to have lashes;
F. The knight has a thin waist (i.e. hourglass figure)
and Finally,
G. I have about 13 years experience staring at catalogs and picking out minute
details (ref: I was the first to predict the Snowspeeder had a Trans-Dark Gray
Airplane windshield, and this is from the low-res scan posted last year.)
I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just saying that I am 95% sure. Many others
agree with me, also. Anyway, feel free to disagree. ;) Oh, and FTR, I have
been wrong before when I was 90%+ positive, and I make no guarentees. Oh, one
last thing: I didn't think the knight was female to begin with either.
Jeff
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
| (...) shows (...) red (...) minute (...) You seem quite proud of yourself (and quick to temper), Ok, I know now that I was wrong, cause I have SEEN it. I did not wish to offend (no need to get riled), just wished to make a statement from opinion and (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
| (...) Perhaps you have a larger picture than I do, but I have to say that the only female I see is on the top of the tower of 6091. The knight by the gate shows no obvious female characteristics. In fact, with that style helm on, how can you say for (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
