Subject:
|
Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 11 Dec 1999 17:35:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2481 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Aaron West writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Steve Bliss writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel wrote:
> > >
> > > > In lugnet.castle, Steve Bliss writes:
> > > > > In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel wrote:
> > > > > Actually (resizing and enhancing the scanned image), it almost looks like • the
> > > > > female head from Adventurers...
> > > >
> > > > I'm pretty sure it isn't Gail Storm. The eyse are different.
> > >
> > > Hmm. I can't tell. Dr. Kilroy is hoarding all the magnifying glasses.
> >
> > Everytime someone uses that name, I think of a robot from Secret of Mana.
> > Anyone else? No? 'Kay, guess I'm just wierd... :)
> > >
> > > It would be cool to get another face based on the "pouty lips" face (there • are
> > > two, right? The Pirate Wench/Islander Babe face, and the Ice Planet Babe
> > > face). But it doesn't look like that's the face, either.
> >
> > Definitely. As far as I know, yes, those are the only two.
> > >
> > > > > Hey! I just realized that her torso has a print for 'feminine • armor'! :):)
> > > > > Well, ok, I'm not 100% sure (it's a tiny picture!). And it's a nutty idea
> > > > > what armorer in his right mind would make armor with those features?
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't appear to be form fitting armor. It *is* a shweet new Plate • Mail
> > > > design, though. There may be an opening showing off some of her cleavage,
> > > > but it could just as easily be armor decoration.
> > >
> > > Nope, no cleavage. Well, maybe a little.
> > >
> > > Looking at the pattern, it *could* be a shield-shaped design, but it looks
> > > like the torso has an hourglass waist (printed).
> >
> > Yeah, yer right! Cool, actual female armor!
>
> People, she is just wearing a *tight* blue dress, nooo armor (she's got
> cleavage!) with a shawl (spelling?) or sweatery thing over her shoulders.
> She ain't no warrior chick.
I think they're talking about a different girl - they think there are two
girls - the "princess", AND a warrior-girl.
I'm not so sure - I don't have the catalog with me, and the one at brickshelf
isn't clear enough to see details.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
| (...) are (...) People, she is just wearing a *tight* blue dress, nooo armor (she's got cleavage!) with a shawl (spelling?) or sweatery thing over her shoulders. She ain't no warrior chick. Aaron>maniac@vol.com (27 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
