|
| |
|  
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
 | | Re: HDRI and radiosity
|
| (...) Hi Mike, thank you for your quick answer. Can you send me the modified color-file? Or can you tell me a link for download? Would be great... I set ambience in the critical pictures to a higher level without any good result. Only if I use (...) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: How would you do it?
|
| (...) If I understand it correctly, 'ambient' is what you see if all lights are off. I usually turn this down very low (zero). 'Diffuse' is reflected light from other surfaces, you'd want quite a lot of that. (...) Yes, I think the default (...) (13 years ago, 2-Jun-11, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Problem using difference
|
| Hi Paul, I'd like to thank you for your help on this. I assigned a clear pigment to the box: difference{ object { Scimitr2_dot_dat } box { <40,-43,-360>,<350,85,280> pigment{color Clear}} } It never occurred to me to give the box a color. Of course, (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | LPub and white on white
|
| I am trying to use LPub to generate a set of building images where most of the bricks are white. Unfortunately, they blend in completely with the background at the tops of the bricks. I have found the setting for setting a BG colour for the part (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
| (...) Yep. -p Don't substitute any primitives in the P directory with POV equivalents ---...--- In order to have a nicer looking image some parts (primitives) in the P directory are by default substituted with POV equivalents. E.g. 4-4cyli.dat is (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: PovRay Error
|
| (...) This is because there are a few LGEO parts that are missing their _clear definitions. I think you can get around this by putting this line after you #include "lg_defs.inc": #declare lg_6081_clear = lg_6081; (...) No idea on this one. I can't (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Another space render...
|
| (...) Here's what I did: in MS-DOS, in the LGEO directory, I typed dir *.inc > lgeo.txt I opened the text file in Excel to grab the column of available part files. I reopened the text file and separated "lg_", the part #, and ".inc" into three (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
| (...) The concept is 4 years old. The newest version of Datsville I could find is less than a month old: (URL) How did you make your animation? I moved the camera along a spline curve. This technique is really useful once you learn how to do it (the (...) (21 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Is it possible to use LDView as POV-Ray previewer?
|
| (...) I did some investigation (read: experimentation), and came to the conclusion that I'm not going to be able to produce a camera matrix that POV will accept. The problem is that I use floats in my matrix, and they're not accurate enough to (...) (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: help!!! - light sources in POV-RAY
|
| Franklin W. Cain skrev i meddelandet ... (...) (This (more or less) has already been posted in the thread 'lit truck raytrace wallpaper...' in connection with headlights) Don't try to put lights inside other pieces, edit the .POV file instead, and (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Sand Green and POV
|
| "Kevin Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:H8zv6n.n1z@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) using (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I have a include file that I use for lighting. It defines a shadowless light source that (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Getting camera angle, field of view and distance right
|
| It seems to me that one of the more fiddly things in POV is to try to get these items right. Does anyone have any tips or tools? Ideally I'd like to have a bounding box or wireframe of my model that I could interactively turn, twist, zoom in and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Raytracing a primarily black model
|
| "Bram Lambrecht" <lego@bldesign.org> schreef in bericht news:IEKDJ4.ro1@lugnet.com... (...) Hi Bram, The secret is: don't use radiosity! Haha. But seriously: as far as I remember the Hudson posters are done without radiosity. It can be done but you (...) (19 years ago, 9-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?
|
| (...) Hi, I agree with you that the viewangle has a big influence on the picture if you use a TFT. As a result of this I think it doesn't matter how I finetune my TFT or grafic card settings. I have no real chance to fix the viewangle... hmm maybe (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: trans black holes
|
| "Tom Bozzo" <abozzo*nospam@midplains.net> wrote in message news:HKo0z5.204y@lugnet.com... (...) max (...) haan's (...) series. Try (...) it back (...) me. (...) v1 (...) The max_trace_level is in the 2.3 version. About the artifacts (or black (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Simple POV-Ray Question - Perspective
|
| (...) Don't you then have to move the camera a ways back to get all your objects in the image compared to larger camera angles? This is what I tend to do, long ways away, small canera angle (anaogous to "telephoto" in real photogs, the images there (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Is there anyway to know the estimate time in POV-RAY?
|
| (...) Try to render it at a small resulution, and then estimate the time needed to render it all by multiplying the time for the small one with the size increase you are planning. Take an example: Render the image at 120x80 pixels. Let's assume that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
|
| | Re: Trouble with POV 3.5 (a solution)
|
| (...) I noticed that is happens when you use the LGEO-parts. Everything is okee when you don't use LGEO. But the solution is pretty easy: Open the lg_color.inc in a text-editor and the line: #version 3.5 before #include "colors.inc" and the line: (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
rendering
(score: 1.730)
|
