Subject:
|
Re: Contributer Agreement Version 3
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:43:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
879 times
|
| |
|
|
Orion Pobursky wrote:
> Wayne Gramlich wrote:
> > Indeed, I'll go one step further, the CA is totally
> > unenforceable.
I am not quite sure that is true (although I can argue for
it in terms of Danish contract law).
> Isn't getting the Author to agree to the change procedure
> the same as them giving to consent to change? In other
> words, I give permission to change the license if the
> follow conditions are met. Is the fact that it's
> conditional a problem?
It depends (the usual answer, when you start discussing
legal problems). The problem I can see with the CA is
related to the way it gives LDraw.org a special status _and_
the way the parts authors are "forced" to accept the CA.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Girder bridge:
http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Transport/Broer/Gitterbro/detalje
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Contributer Agreement Version 3
|
| (...) I honestly think that the CA immediately violates the CCAL (Creative Commons Attribution License) section 4a and is, thus, intrinsically unenforcable due to section 7a. Please read my other response to Orion the more complete response. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Contributer Agreement Version 3
|
| (...) You make some very good points. I do have one question though: Isn't getting the Author to agree to the change procedure the same as them giving to consent to change? In other words, I give permission to change the license if the follow (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
