To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 131
130  |  132
Subject: 
Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 18:42:45 GMT
Viewed: 
51 times
  
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:23:29 GMT, "John Bauman" <jtb86@ptdprolog.net>
wrote:

In which case MPD would be better [than inlining] anyway.

Agreed completely.  For serious file-sharing, MPD is way better than
inlining.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress)
 
Steve Bliss wrote in message <375bc53d.299725817@...et.com>... (...) In which case MPD would be better anyway. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

39 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR