| |
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:06:07 GMT, Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote:
> This raises an important question. We should have a standard format for
> submodels for the TLG models. MPD or inlining? Given my limited
> knowledge, which is more user-friendly? can LDraw/LEdit/LDLite read an
> inlined file without the user having to do anything? I know you have to
> expand an MPD to the original dat files before you can see the submodels.
> Which do you all prefer?
I'd recommend going with MPD. LDLite will render a (properly formatted)
MPD file, and the MPD format allows downloaders the possibility of
splitting the file back into its separate pieces. Inline is a one-way
operation.
Steve
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) Actually, Steve, it isn't one way if you don't mind doing a little cutting and pasting :) So if you really think MPD is that much better than what you did, where can I get it to see if I like it, I mean there must be some sort of program to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) This raises an important question. We should have a standard format for submodels for the TLG models. MPD or inlining? Given my limited knowledge, which is more user-friendly? can LDraw/LEdit/LDLite read an inlined file without the user having (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
