Subject:
|
Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 12:08:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1265 times
|
| |
| |
Tim Courtney:
> This raises an important question. We should have a standard format for
> submodels for the TLG models. MPD or inlining? Given my limited
> knowledge, which is more user-friendly? can LDraw/LEdit/LDLite read an
> inlined file without the user having to do anything? I know you have to
> expand an MPD to the original dat files before you can see the submodels.
> Which do you all prefer?
MPD.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) This raises an important question. We should have a standard format for submodels for the TLG models. MPD or inlining? Given my limited knowledge, which is more user-friendly? can LDraw/LEdit/LDLite read an inlined file without the user having (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|