| |
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 21:02:52 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com> wrote:
> Is there any way to reverse the inlining to the original file (lossless
> outlining, I guess it would be) using the comment that the inlining function
> writes? Does the matrix math work in this direction?
Outlining can only be done with manual intervention, because there's no
final delimiter on the inlined code. So the human has to select the code
to outline.
I *think* the matrix math can be reversed, but I'm not sure. I don't know
if there is an inverse for matrix multiplication or not. If not, each
transform is a 12-equation system of 12 variables, so it should be
solvable.
Note to [everyone who is not Sproaticus]: A single inlined reference can be
undone with cut and paste. But if a subfile is inlined more than once in a
single master file, cut and paste won't correctly undo all of the inlines.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
39 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
