|
 | | Uber-install (was Re: Organizing the Site Revamp)
|
| (...) And (potentially) splitmpd, l3p, and ldscript. Any others I'm forgetting? (...) Right, except why include the Win32 programs for people who can't use them? Most of the huge-o programs (LDAO) are 32-bit. It's not a big deal on CD distributions, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) I am totally opposed to this. LDraw was started to model Lego elements and that is what we have adhered to. And as long as I have the watch, so to speak, I will not knowingly allow fictitious parts into an official update. I even have some (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Organizing the Site Revamp
|
| (...) Optional, yes. Good point. (...) Which would basically be "download LDRAW.EXE and all the LCAD updates" (...) Using the right Win31 Program Manager API calls would do away with the need for a Win32 install; program folders and icons can be (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) I considered modeling some K'Nex pieces in LDraw. There aren't that many different (useful) K'Nex pieces. But then I realized that the sizes would be all wrong for the movement keystrokes in LEdit. So I gave it up. Steve (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) It's both. Not that I'm closed-minded, but I really have a lot of trouble imagining a competitor ever coming out with a better product in the same category as LEGO. And even if one did -- and even if the product were totally LEGO compatible -- (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| (...) Just for reference, pair gives 40mb and an unlimited number of potential e-mail accounts, although only one is an actual pop-type account. But by using procmail or something similar you could have webmaster@ldraw.org forwarded to bob@home.com (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) Is there a way (or rules) to prevent non-TLG parts from creeping into the official LDraw updates? That seems like the only practical/logical danger...any other objections (like mine) would be personal/subjective. I don't use LDraw/LEdit enough (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Subgroup for Revamp?
|
| (...) Probably good, so we can weed out general ldraw discussion from site discussion. I see the Re: proposal.. thread has been chopped up into the set/piece discussion too..that would help on that as well. lugnet.cad.dev.site? Keep Building!! -Tim (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) Um, I wouldn't object either, as long as it is off-site and clearly marked as unofficial clone parts. We don't need to see "Keep Ldraw Pure" buttons popping up on people's sites.. ;) Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 New (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| (...) Well, the point isd that hugin.etc thinks it's name isn't ldraw.org, but hugin.etc.. Then it returns that to the user. There are special services available with some domain-registry-services, that give you another layer in between which will (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.147)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| [ Moving to lugnet.publish ] (...) Apache: <URL:(URL) (...) I can't remember the details, but basically you just create a catalog for the new server and add a few lines to one of the configuration files that informs Apache of the relation between (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| Steve Bliss (blisses@worldnet.att.net) wrote: [ about adding maintenance information to the parts files ] (...) I think it is a good idea. Information about which names the file has had in the past will be useful for updating old models, and the (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) I agree with that. I would have no objections to linking to custom sites for non-lego parts. The more the merrier. I just think that LDraw should remain just that. Not MBDraw or TDraw. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) You're a brave man. ;) (...) I think you've gotten a taste of how the community feels. This has come up before, with some half-height plates (I think these were Tyco parts, maybe MegaBloks did them, too). They were not allowed into a parts (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) You know, I thought of this after I posted. A while ago, someone posted a Mindstorms "Rocker Boogie Rambler". (1)(2) It used MOC LDraw pieces to represent rubber bands, and those parts were inlined into the model. I wouldn't have any moral (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | helping making new pieces and .dat format
|
| Hi there, I'm a 25 year old Technic Lego-player, but less fanatic with internet and news- groups, so I discovered LDraw just some weeks ago. It works rather well and I'm really enthousistic about it. If I want to help with making new pieces (Technic (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | Re: Organizing the Site Revamp
|
| (...) This tactic of registration, just by its intrusive nature, is evil. Not to mention, riddled with about a *ton* of technical details that really shouldn't need to be worked out. LDraw is in a continual state of growth. If anyone *really* wants (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| (...) Um, then pair.com is a better choice than Osiris. Mike-friendly modeler.. what's wrong with Ldraw? :) (...) Good ideas.. A model competition isn't a bad idea, with a set as a prize or credit in Auczilla..something like that (the $$ for the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
|
| | Re: What color are they really?
|
| (...) I can't answer your question, because I don't have any of the snow-plows. But I can say that when I made those baseplates, color 10 was basically unassigned (I don't think a color-list had been added to the FAQ yet). It seemed like the right (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.146)
|
