|
 | | Quality of authored parts
|
| Perhaps this would be a good time to have a discussion of standards for authoring new parts--separate from any particular parts or authors. How realistic do you think parts ought to be in order to be considered for inclusion in the official L-CAD (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| 
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.614)
|
|
| | Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
|
| Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:377c79d9.335312...net.com... (...) update (...) how (...) be (...) the (...) as (...) I think we should allow stickers. Granted they won't look spectacular in LDraw or LDLite right now, but (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.589)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
| Tim Courtney wrote in message <199906152252.PAA294...mm.com>... (...) decorated (...) unavailable (...) errors (...) My comments: If an OMR submission is not complete i.e. elements are missing, (even these are decorated elements, minifig (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.584)
|
|
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) That sounds like a really wise idea...and positively A/R, which is a Good Thing too. :-) And not only that (but related), there probably is a good reason to have an extras.dat file to codify the extra elements that come with a set (things like (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.584)
|
|
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.583)
|
|
| | OMR Submission and Storage
|
| I feel that we should wrap up plans on OMR submission and storage so we can get the structure in place to begin accepting models on the OMR itself. First off, PLEASE DO NOT email me your submissions to the OMR. As of now I am not officially (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.574)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) Though 'OMR' would denote a submission to the OMR, etc, it would be better to have a separate group so there is absolutely no question what is a submission and what is not. All we need is for an editor to pick up a non-submitted model that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| 
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.573)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| (...) Yes. Sticker-files should be just the stickers, not stickers-stuck-on-parts. The numbers for the sticker files should use the ID number printed on the sticker sheet, but I don't remember if the long (7 digit?) or short (5 digit) number is (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.573)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) probably (...) save model (...) features (...) marking a (...) free the (...) I agree that a whole new newsgroup would be best, but I was just trying to point out that it would probably work. Not a big deal either way as far as I am concerned. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.573)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) We might as well use models.sets for this, and just have authors include "OMR" in the subject header. This will avoid the confusion that would come with two (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.573)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) So do I. But I probably wouldn't subscribe to a sets or omr newsgroup by mail. It would work, but why not avoid possible confusion and go for 100% certainty on a completely new dedicated newsgroup? Some people might think that (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.573)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) cad.dat.models.omr) will (...) and it will also (...) authors include (...) search multiple (...) would be better (...) what is a (...) pick up a (...) and get the (...) need flamewars (...) Like Todd said, I think 'OMR SUBMISSION set XXXX' (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.573)
|
|
| | Parts and Pattern
|
| Hallo ! Am 01.09.99 schrieb John VanZwieten: (...) That's an argument! JV> But LDraw novices won't be able to offset something by 0.1 LDU. I JV> was using LEdit at least 6 months before I learned you could hit JV> "x" and any number to offset on the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.565)
|
|
| | Parts and Pattern
|
| Hallo ! Am 28.08.99 schrieb Steve Bliss: SB> There was extensive discussion about this issue, before the L-CAD SB> ... SB> the target piece, as shown in the set instructions. Nice. And had there been some result of the discussion? SB> I would *love* (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.565)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| (...) Was it? I couldn't remember. I've got an archive of most of the 'sticker discussion', but it's not on this machine. I'm sure I was a proponent of thick stickers. I reversed my position because LDraw objects are just shells, not solid 3D. But (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.565)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| [cross-posted and follow-up set to lugnet.cad.dev] (...) Hi! (...) There was extensive discussion about this issue, before the L-CAD mailing list moved to lugnet.cad.dev. The general thought was that stickers should be separate 'part files'. There (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.565)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| Lars C. Hassing <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:57F1FE754246D21...@aarhus... (...) But LDraw novices won't be able to offset something by 0.1 LDU. I was using LEdit at least 6 months before I learned you could hit "x" and any number to (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.565)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37cbd256.575508...net.com... (...) I thought the consensus was to do the stickers in 3D, maybe 2LDU thick. This would at least give a sticker a shot of being recognizable in LDraw, and (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.564)
|
|
| | How do we handle stickers in Ldraw?
|
| Dear List, I remember that some times ago we have discussed the topic of Lego stickers in Ldraw. There was no clear agreement on the nomenclature, the positioning, assigment to parts etc. I'm writing this mail to unfreeze slightly this topic, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.351)
|
|
| | Re: How do we handle stickers in Ldraw?
|
| (...) I agree that stickers should be grouped somehow and if the sheet number is available and is not longer than 5 character than our convention for runners will work. If this is not case we could assign a 3 digit number or borrow the number of the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 2.345)
|
