Subject:
|
Re: Parts and Pattern
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Aug 1999 13:12:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
567 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 02:30:51 GMT, jprobst@shadow-corner.ows.es (Joachim
Probst) wrote:
> Nice. And had there been some result of the discussion?
Yes.
Sticker-files should be just the stickers, not stickers-stuck-on-parts.
The numbers for the sticker files should use the ID number printed on the
sticker sheet, but I don't remember if the long (7 digit?) or short (5
digit) number is appropriate. The Numbers Committee would know. Since
there are generally multiple stickers per sheet, each filename would
require a suffix to make it unique.
The 'thickness' issue was never decided, I think. But LDraw doesn't model
solid objects, so having thick stickers wouldn't offer many advantages. So
just model the sticker in 2D.
I'd also say just model the actual decorative pattern of the sticker. Do
the plain edge if it seems appropriate.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37cbd256.575508...net.com... (...) I thought the consensus was to do the stickers in 3D, maybe 2LDU thick. This would at least give a sticker a shot of being recognizable in LDraw, and (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Parts and Pattern
|
| Hallo ! Am 28.08.99 schrieb Steve Bliss: SB> There was extensive discussion about this issue, before the L-CAD SB> ... SB> the target piece, as shown in the set instructions. Nice. And had there been some result of the discussion? SB> I would *love* (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
